What devilweed are you smoking Walky? Of course this is Krunix's character model. It's not his color model, but I'm really failign to see your point. It's the character model Krunix was based on, in the same way Sunstorm was based on a Seeker. -Derik 19:42, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- His character model, if he had one, was just Fracas's. Uncolored. Coloring it yourself and presenting it as his actual character model without explaining its photoshoppy origins is pretty much just lying. --ItsWalky 19:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- It's noted in the damn article that he's a generic.
- And if you think it needs a note, put in a note. Don't delete the thing. That's an accurate rendering of Krunix's robot mode that we never really god a good picture of. (It always looked lumpy.)
- What crawled up your ass and died? -Derik 19:48, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- No, you noted in the article that the original US version of the comic misidentified Krunix as Cyclonus. Which is, y'know, not correct. Springer was drawing the wrong models, and the UK put a band-aid over it. Not saying even that much is just irresponsible. Other things that are irresponsible -- telling us he shrinks when he transforms, and pointing out a spec in the background as a depiction of his altmode. I don't even know why I'm having this conversation. --ItsWalky 19:58, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm really failing to see anything here that couldn't have been rectified by a sharp "Hey fuckwad! Make this article's relationship to the source material explicit, including the provenance of the pictures."
- Image:Quintbailiff anime.png is a colored character model. Are you going to delete it, or just request a better image credit? There isn't a decent picture of the Bailiffs in all the canon. I know, I looked.
- At any rate, since you objected specifically that the original pic did not 'explain its photoshoppy origins', and you left the image tag in, I'm assuming you wish me to replace it with a better-credited image. I do so now. -Derik 20:36, 26 June 2007 (UTC)
