Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki

Welcome to Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki. You may wish to create or login to an account in order to have full editing access to this wiki.

READ MORE

Teletraan I: The Transformers Wiki
Advertisement

Isn't this still just a rumor? - Dark T Zeratul 09:43, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Well, its from the official ARG site, unless its an elaborate hoax. Plus Walky (admin) himself put Weaving in the movie cast and movie Megs entries. Easy enough to delete this article if it doesn't pan out. --FFN 10:23, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
I think this should be in universe and talk about Agent Weaving, the plant.us That is our thing right?
Sometimes, usually our articles about real people who worked on TF are done 'straight'. I'd prefer to save such jokes for snarky captions for Megatron (when more information is officially released). --FFN 10:49, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Tha difference being most actors/real people aren't also characters in the fiction. Thanks to the meta-game Agent Weaving is now a character in the fiction, and that must be covered. He's pretty unique now. Our own Sgt. Slaughter. -Zacwilliam(posting via Wii, so forgive the choppyness)
Not so unique, really. 'Cause, Raksha, Ben Yee, Stan Bush. That's how this should be handled, with a fiction section. --KilMichaelMcC 11:20, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Ok' ya got me. They slipped my mind. I still think he's rather unique in that he's a famous person purposely introed into the fiction, vs. a fan-nod/easter egg but the difference is rather semantic and a fiction section for Hugo should serve fine (I just find the exclusively in-universe entries fun. :) )--ZacWilliam 13:35, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
Richard Branson. That said, there's no reason there can't also be a page for Agent Weaving. --Steve-o 17:45, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

i call vandalism on this page. anyone else see it?--72.66.73.224 05:29, 26 May 2007 (UTC)

Mnnnoooo...? --ItsWalky 06:28, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
this:
"Of course, this is all scandalous lies perpetrated by the Illumin- I mean, those heathen scientists. He's really an undercover agent working for Sector 7, trying to hide the N.B.E.'s from the public, and covering it up by acting fictional movies, like that thing with the jewelry or the internet that plugs into your brain. This is all, of course, to keep you from seeing the upcoming historical documentary."
Outright vandalizing garbage.
No, it isn't. Scroll down to the fiction section. --KilMichaelMcC 06:01, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
Kil's right. Hugo Weaving was included in the Sector 7 website fiction. --ItsWalky 06:26, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
That's well and good for the fiction section, but not for the top section about Hugo Weaving the ACTOR, not Hugo Weaving the quoteunquote "spy".--72.66.73.224 04:08, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
The top section is about both! You know, like chocolate and peanut butter. That's not "outright vandalism." --ItsWalky 05:14, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
But it leads to confusion. Not everybody knows about that Sector 7 site. I sure didn't. So when I saw that description, I thought "oh gawd, this movie is giving birth to the biggest smartasses I've ever seen". Plus, wikis are about posting FACTS about stuff. FACT: Hugo Weaving is an actor. FACT: A website tying-in to a film Weaving is appearing him portrays him as a spy working on the film, in other words, an in-story hoax.--72.66.73.224 08:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
As one of the Australians here, and speaking for my fellow Australian, I think Hugo would be amused at this article. Or not. Anyway, there's no need to be all serious and uptight about what is an amusing way to announce a casting by making the very actor a character. - FFN @ class
If you think the way a piece of information is presented is misleading or confusing, you are welcome to edit it. Just be aware that your version may be considered inferior, particularly if it accomplishes nothing but removing humor, and may be reverted. Personally, I think the way this particular joke is presented is lame, but I like the idea of there being a joke of some sort about it. Go ahead and fix it -- try to make it "cute" or good-humored without being smart-assy. I think that would be an improvement. --Steve-o 16:18, 28 May 2007 (UTC)
I was kinda hoping someone would make it funnier by now. When I wrote that, it was just the first thing that came to mind, and I never could think of anything better. So... who's funny here? Cause it would be helpful. King Starscream 06:56, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
Advertisement